Eldridge v. State

135 So. 646, 24 Ala. App. 395, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 42
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1931·No. 8 Div. 317.·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and the judgment is assigned as error.- 'The evidence tends to show that a five-gallon jug of whisky was found on defendant’s place, out in the field about two hundred yards from his house in a pile of cotton-seed hulls. The pile of cotton-seed hulls was .near the road. The ground was covered with snow, and there were some human tracks leading from defendant’s house to the pile of cotton-seed hulls and back to the house. The defendant was not at home when the officers found the whisky and had not been there that day. No evidence tending to prove that the tracks were made by defendant appears, and nothing tending to connect defendant with the possession of the whisky further than that it was on his place. This is not sufficient to convict. Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283, 101 So. 511; Fair v. State, 16 Ala. App: 152, 75 So. 828.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eldridge v. State, 135 So. 646, 24 Ala. App. 395, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 42 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

135 So. 646 (Eldridge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grimes v. State
76 So. 2d 684 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1954)
Burt v. State
68 So. 2d 51 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1953)
Riddlespur v. State
40 So. 2d 640 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1948)
Pate v. State
26 So. 2d 214 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1946)
Chancellor v. State
199 So. 749 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1941)
Wilbanks v. State
185 So. 770 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1939)
Campbell v. State
182 So. 89 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1938)
Cunningham v. State
159 So. 267 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1935)
Coker v. State
143 So. 206 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1932)