Eldred v. United States

257 F. 58, 168 C.C.A. 270, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2172
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 1919
DocketNo. 5235
StatusPublished

This text of 257 F. 58 (Eldred v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eldred v. United States, 257 F. 58, 168 C.C.A. 270, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2172 (8th Cir. 1919).

Opinion

AMIDON, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity by the United States against the defendant Eldred to cancel patents obtained upon soldiers’ homestead entries. The trial court found the entries to be fraudulent and entered a decree in favor of the government. The defendant appeals.

The defendant is a prosperous ranchman living in Deuel county, Neb. He had been occupying large tracts of public domain, inclosing the same by fences, as a part of his ranch. He had been ordered to remove the fences. To meet this emergency he went to Saline county, Neb., and induced a large number of old soldiers to locate homestead entries on the land under the Kincaid Act. He paid their expenses from the time they started; he selected their claims, erected improvements upon them, boarded the claimants while they were carrying on their pretended residence, and paid the expenses of making final proof. As soon as the entrymen obtained their patents, he paid each of them $500 for his homestead, in exact accordance with the agreement which he made with them when he first saw them. If such a fraud as this could be sustained, there would be no limit to the amount of public lands which could be obtained through dummy entrymen. This is not the law. On the contrary, the law has of late years been going steadily against such practices. United States v. Richards (D. C.) 149 Fed. 443, 175 Fed. 911; Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. United States, 237 U. S. 481, 35 Sup. Ct. 659, 59 L. Ed. 1058; United States v. Moorhead, 243 U. S. 607, 37 Sup. Ct. 458, 61 L. Ed. 926.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. United States
237 U.S. 481 (Supreme Court, 1915)
United States v. Morehead
243 U.S. 607 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Richards v. United States
175 F. 911 (Eighth Circuit, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 F. 58, 168 C.C.A. 270, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eldred-v-united-states-ca8-1919.