Eldred v. First National Bank
71 Ind. 543
Opinion
Since this appeal was taken, the single question presented and argued has been decided, adversely to the appellants, in the cases of McCoy v. Payne, 68 Ind. 327, and Hudelson v. Armstrong, 70 Ind. 99.
By the latter case, it is shown that the common-law rule, “ whereby, if one of two or more joint promisors or obligors should die, his representatives were at law discharged, and the survivor or survivors alone could be sued,” has never been a part of the law of this State.
The judgment of the circuit courtis affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eldred v. First National Bank, 71 Ind. 543 (Ind. 1880).
71 Ind. 543 (Eldred v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCoy v. Payne
68 Ind. 327 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)
Hudelson v. Armstrong
70 Ind. 99 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)