Eldorado Jewelry Co. v. Hitchcock & Camp
70 S.E. 658, 136 Ga. 22, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 399
This text of 70 S.E. 658 (Eldorado Jewelry Co. v. Hitchcock & Camp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eldorado Jewelry Co. v. Hitchcock & Camp, 70 S.E. 658, 136 Ga. 22, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 399 (Ga. 1911).
Opinion
1. A refusal to strike the answer of a defendant, on motion, furnishes no proper ground of a motion for a new trial. Hawkins v. Studdard, 132 Ga. 265 (63 S. E. 852, 131 Am. St. Rep. 190).
2. Under the record before us, none of the grounds of the motion for a new trial require a reversal for any reason assigned."
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Byrd v. Grace
158 S.E. 467 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Battle v. Holmes
91 S.E. 32 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Brooke & Co. v. Cunningham Bros.
90 S.E. 1037 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Tompkins v. American Land Co.
77 S.E. 623 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 S.E. 658, 136 Ga. 22, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eldorado-jewelry-co-v-hitchcock-camp-ga-1911.