Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/Elderkin v. Hamilton Pavilion Health Care

Elderkin v. Hamilton Pavilion Health Care

672 A.2d 978, 40 Conn. App. 943, 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 169
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided March 26, 1996·No. 14474·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board, the plaintiff assails the factual findings of the trial commissioner.

[944]*944We have repeatedly stated that we cannot and will not intervene in matters involving the fact-finding function of the trier of fact. This case presents us with no reason to alter this long-standing principle.

Our review of the record and briefs fails to disclose that the trial commissioner and the compensation review board acted other than in accordance with applicable law.

The decision of the compensation review board is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elderkin v. Hamilton Pavilion Health Care, 672 A.2d 978, 40 Conn. App. 943, 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 169 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

672 A.2d 978 (Elderkin v. Hamilton Pavilion Health Care) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schorsch v. Schorsch
731 A.2d 330 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1999)
Elderkin v. Hamilton Pavilion Health Care
677 A.2d 947 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)