Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/Elderkin v. Hamilton Pavilion Health Care

Elderkin v. Hamilton Pavilion Health Care

672 A.2d 978, 40 Conn. App. 943, 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 169
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedMarch 26, 1996
Docket14474
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 672 A.2d 978 (Elderkin v. Hamilton Pavilion Health Care) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elderkin v. Hamilton Pavilion Health Care, 672 A.2d 978, 40 Conn. App. 943, 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 169 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board, the plaintiff assails the factual findings of the trial commissioner.

[944]*944We have repeatedly stated that we cannot and will not intervene in matters involving the fact-finding function of the trier of fact. This case presents us with no reason to alter this long-standing principle.

Our review of the record and briefs fails to disclose that the trial commissioner and the compensation review board acted other than in accordance with applicable law.

The decision of the compensation review board is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schorsch v. Schorsch
731 A.2d 330 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1999)
Elderkin v. Hamilton Pavilion Health Care
677 A.2d 947 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
672 A.2d 978, 40 Conn. App. 943, 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elderkin-v-hamilton-pavilion-health-care-connappct-1996.