Elderkin v. Elderkin
1 Root 139
Opinion
But the court was of opinion — That an action might be^ maintained by Mr. Lee, the indorsee in his own name, as the [140]*140note was executed and indorsed in tbe state of Massachusetts, where by law it was negotiable.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elderkin v. Elderkin, 1 Root 139 (Colo. Ct. App. 1789).
1 Root 139 (Elderkin v. Elderkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brush v. Curtis
4 Conn. 312 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1822)