Elder v. State
This text of 973 So. 2d 1209 (Elder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Latara Nichole ELDER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Judith Ellis, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders[1] appeal, Latara Elder's appellate counsel raises a minor sentencing issue. When Elder violated her probation, the court revoked her probation and sentenced her on all three counts even though counts one and two previously had been nolle prossed. In response to a motion to correct sentencing error filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), the trial court properly vacated the sentence on counts one and two but failed to correct the order of revocation of probation, which continues to show that Elder's probation was revoked on all three counts. We therefore remand with directions that the trial court enter a corrected revocation order removing all reference to counts one and two.
Affirmed and remanded.
FULMER, DAVIS, and KELLY, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
973 So. 2d 1209, 2008 WL 142302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elder-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.