Elder v. Kesting

Supreme Court of Kansas

Elder v. Kesting

109 P. 792, 83 Kan. 803, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 251

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJuly 9, 1910

DocketNo. 16,660

StatusPublished

This text of 109 P. 792 (Elder v. Kesting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elder v. Kesting, 109 P. 792, 83 Kan. 803, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 251 (kan 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cwñam:

The only contention in this case is that the verdict and judgment rendered are contrary to the unccntroverted testimony in the case; in other words, that there is no conflict in the evidence. We have read the evidence, and find that there is a sharp conflict as to the representations made which induced the giving of the orders for the goods in question. The appellants claim that there is no conflict in the evidence — that is, of evidence legally admissible, the order for the goods being in writing. We can not sustain this view, and the judgment is therefore aifirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cwñam:

The only contention in this case is that the verdict and judgment rendered are contrary to the unccntroverted testimony in the case; in other words, that there is no conflict in the evidence. We have read the evidence, and find that there is a sharp conflict as to the representations made which induced the giving of the orders for the goods in question. The appellants claim that there is no conflict in the evidence — that is, of evidence legally admissible, the order for the goods being in writing. We can not sustain this view, and the judgment is therefore aifirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 P. 792, 83 Kan. 803, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elder-v-kesting-kan-1910.