Elder v. International Railway Co.
143 A.D. 960
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the enforcement of the rule requiring the passenger himself to deposit his fare was unreasonable under the circumstances. Spring, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elder v. International Railway Co., 143 A.D. 960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
143 A.D. 960 (Elder v. International Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weber v. Rochester, Syracuse & Eastern Railroad
145 A.D. 84 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)