Elder v. Hamilton
This text of 46 A. 109 (Elder v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The views expressed by the learned court below in the rejection of the plaintiff when offered as a witness to prove the matters stated in the offer are entirely correct, and fully justified the exclusion of the witness. The offer did not include proof of notice to the Teutonia Building and Loan Association of the invalidity of the acknowledgment of her deed to the church prior to its purchase of the property at the sheriff’s sale, and hence the protection of the recording act was not removed. In these circumstances her testimony to establish the facts set forth in the offer was irrelevant and incompetent. The assignments of error are dismissed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 A. 109, 195 Pa. 559, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elder-v-hamilton-pa-1900.