Elder v. Ennis
This text of Elder v. Ennis (Elder v. Ennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1662
In Re: ANTHONY DELBERT ENNIS,
Debtor.
RICHARD ELDER,
Appellant,
versus
ANTHONY DELBERT ENNIS,
Debtor - Appellee,
and
NANCY L. SPENCER GRIGSBY,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-635-8-AW)
Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 3, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Elder, Appellant Pro Se. John R. Garza, GARZA, REGAN & ROSE, P.C., Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee; Nancy L. Spencer Grigsby, Trustee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Richard Elder appeals the district court’s orders: (1)
affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying Elder leave to file
certain documents; and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Elder v. Ennis, No. CA-03-635-8-AW (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2003;
Apr. 29, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Elder v. Ennis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elder-v-ennis-ca4-2003.