Elchahed v. 7-11 Franchise
This text of 111 F. App'x 960 (Elchahed v. 7-11 Franchise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Adel Elchahed appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing for failure to state a claim his complaint against J.D. Green and Associates, 7-11 Franchise, and Valdamire Betancourt. A pro se litigant must be given leave to amend his complaint unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by the amendment. See Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department, 839 F.2d 621, 623 (9th Cir.1988). Elchahed must be given leave to amend his complaint.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 F. App'x 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elchahed-v-7-11-franchise-ca9-2004.