Elbert v. Hoby
73 Ind. 111
Opinion
— We are ashed to reverse the judgment in this case solely on the alleged misconduct of jurors, but the affidavits concerning that misconduct are not made a part of the' record by a bill of exceptions, or by an order of the court. There is therefore no question properly presented for our decision. See McDaniel v. Mattingly, 72 Ind. 349, ■and cases cited.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elbert v. Hoby, 73 Ind. 111 (Ind. 1880).
73 Ind. 111 (Elbert v. Hoby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greenwalt v. State
209 N.E.2d 254 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1965)
Rains v. State
36 N.E. 532 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Arnold
34 N.E. 742 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)
Zehner v. Aultman
74 Ind. 24 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Wood v. Crane
75 Ind. 207 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)