Elbert Moore, Inc. v. Green

166 So. 2d 794, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2655
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 8, 1964·No. No. 33074·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because of an apparent conflict of decisions we have heard the parties on both jurisdiction and merits. After oral argument and careful study of the record and briefs, we have concluded that the instant decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, does not conflict with any prior decision of this Court or another District Court of Appeal. We conclude that the writ of certiorari was improvidently issued and it is, therefore, discharged, Fla.App., 156 So.2d 397.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elbert Moore, Inc. v. Green, 166 So. 2d 794, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2655 (Fla. 1964).

166 So. 2d 794 (Elbert Moore, Inc. v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elbert Moore, Inc. v. Green
156 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)