Elamin v. Roberts Express, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Elamin v. Roberts Express, Inc.

290 A.D.2d 291, 735 N.Y.S.2d 549, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 296

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 290 A.D.2d 291 (Elamin v. Roberts Express, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elamin v. Roberts Express, Inc., 290 A.D.2d 291, 735 N.Y.S.2d 549, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered April 6, 2001, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Conflicting deposition testimony as to whether, as plaintiff claims, she was struck by defendants’ vehicle while crossing the street, or whether, as defendants claim, the vehicle stopped before she came in contact with it, raises an issue of credibility inappropriate for resolution on a motion for summary judgment (see, Sanchez v Finke, 288 AD2d 122). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner, Buckley and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered April 6, 2001, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Conflicting deposition testimony as to whether, as plaintiff claims, she was struck by defendants’ vehicle while crossing the street, or whether, as defendants claim, the vehicle stopped before she came in contact with it, raises an issue of credibility inappropriate for resolution on a motion for summary judgment (see, Sanchez v Finke, 288 AD2d 122). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner, Buckley and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 291, 735 N.Y.S.2d 549, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elamin-v-roberts-express-inc-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack