Elam v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Elam v. State

1931 OK CR 281, 300 P. 1119, 51 Okla. Crim. 124, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 288

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 6, 1931

DocketNo. A-7823.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 281 (Elam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elam v. State, 1931 OK CR 281, 300 P. 1119, 51 Okla. Crim. 124, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 288 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Pontotoc county of the crime of robbery with firearms, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for five years.

Defendant was jointly charged with one R. R. Kinsey with the crime of robbery with firearms. Defendant demanded a severance, and the state elected to try Kinsey first. He was found guilty, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for eight years. On the 6th day of March, 1931, this court affirmed such conviction, and thereafter in due course of time denied a petition for rehearing.

The evidence of the state in the case at bar is practically the same as the evidence in the Kinsey Case, and the questions of law raised are practically the same. For a full discussion of the facts and the law see Kinsey v. State, 50 Okla. Cr. 258, 296 Pac. 1002.

Upon the authority of the Kinsey Case, this cause is affirmed.

DAVENPORT, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI