Elam v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Elam v. Kelley

96 S.E. 568, 148 Ga. 303, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 317

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 14, 1918·No. No. 753·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

This case is controlled by the principle decided in Barfield v. Covington, 103 Ga. 190 (29 S. E. 759); and the court did not err in sustaining a demurrer to the amended plea of the defendant who was surety on the forthcoming bond, nor in entering the judgment complained of. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Burnside & McWhorter, for plaintiffs in error C. J. Perryman, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

This case is controlled by the principle decided in Barfield v. Covington, 103 Ga. 190 (29 S. E. 759); and the court did not err in sustaining a demurrer to the amended plea of the defendant who was surety on the forthcoming bond, nor in entering the judgment complained of. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Burnside & McWhorter, for plaintiffs in error C. J. Perryman, contra.

Elam v. Kelley, 96 S.E. 568, 148 Ga. 303, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 317 (Ga. 1918).

Pincite

96 S.E. 568 (Elam v. Kelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related