Elam, Darius Duron

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 17, 2014
DocketWR-13,444-13
StatusPublished

This text of Elam, Darius Duron (Elam, Darius Duron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elam, Darius Duron, (Tex. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-13,444-13

IN RE DARIUS DURON ELAM, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 380350 IN THE 232nd DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he obtained post-conviction DNA testing pursuant

to Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, that the results of such testing were returned

on February 19, 2014, but that the trial court has not conducted a hearing or made findings as to

whether, had the results been available during the trial of the offense, it is reasonably probable that

Relator would not have been convicted of the offense, as required by Article 64.04 of the Texas

Code of Criminal Procedure. Relator sought relief in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, which denied

Relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus because Relator had not demonstrated that a motion for 2

a hearing or findings was pending in the trial court or had been presented to the trial court, or that

the trial court has had reasonable time in which to rule on said motion. In re Elam, No. 14-14-

00826-CR (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] October 20, 2014).

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by stating whether or not Relator has filed

a motion for the trial court to conduct a hearing and make findings under Article 64.04 in Harris

County. If Relator has filed such a motion, the response shall state the date upon which such motion

was filed, and shall state whether or not the motion has been presented to the trial court, and if so,

when. If Relator has filed such a motion and the motion has been presented to the trial court, the

response shall state whether a hearing has been conducted and findings made. This application for

leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the

appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: December 17, 2014 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Elam, Darius Duron, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elam-darius-duron-texcrimapp-2014.