Eladio Gomez-Velazco v. Jefferson Sessions

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Eladio Gomez-Velazco v. Jefferson Sessions. Read the opinion of the Court — 879 F.3d 989
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 31, 2018·No. 14-71747·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELADIO GOMEZ-VELAZCO, Nos. 14-71747 Petitioner, 14-73303

v. Agency No. A205-829-885 JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. ORDER

Filed May 31, 2018

Before: Paul J. Watford and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges, and Gloria M. Navarro,* Chief District Judge.

ORDER

A judge of the court sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this case en banc. A vote was taken, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non- recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Rehearing en banc is DENIED.

* The Honorable Gloria M. Navarro, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eladio Gomez-Velazco v. Jefferson Sessions, (9th Cir. 2018).

Eladio Gomez-Velazco v. Jefferson Sessions (Eladio Gomez-Velazco v. Jefferson Sessions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.