El v. Toohey
17 A.2d 165, 125 N.J.L. 510, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 278
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
El v. Toohey, 17 A.2d 165, 125 N.J.L. 510, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 278 (N.J. 1941).
17 A.2d 165 (El v. Toohey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schulman v. Male
175 A.2d 450 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Bancredit, Inc. v. Bethea
168 A.2d 250 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Ratsch v. Holderman
158 A.2d 24 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)
Mayti v. Male
158 A.2d 70 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
In the Matter of Merger and Consolidation
64 A.2d 652 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)