El v. Tek Systems Inc

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 4, 2003
• Docket: 02-2241
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2241

AUBREY J. EL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TEK SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee, and

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-111-3)

Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 4, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aubrey J. El, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Michael Keating, DUNN, CURCIO, KEATING & BRACKEN, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia; J. Eric Paltell, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Aubrey J. El appeals the district court’s orders granting the

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying El’s motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See El v. Tek Systems, Inc. No. CA-02-111-3 (E.D. Va. Sept.

24, 2002; Oct. 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED