El v. District Court Clark County

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 7, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-01015·Unknown

Opinion

3 Case No. 2:24-cv-01015-JAD-NJK 4 RASONDO MEEKS EL, 5 Plaintiff ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 6] RECOMMENDATION AND 7 DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, et DISMISSING CASE 8] al., 9 Defendants 10] On December 18, the magistrate judge entered this report and recommendation: 11 On September 25, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiffs original complaint pursuant to 1228 U.S.C. § 1915@). Docket No. 6. On November 21, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff's 13}amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Docket No. 9. The Court therein determined the complaint failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and found that the Rooker- 15 Feldman doctrine and the Younger abstention doctrine precludes it from exercising subject matter 16 jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims. /d. at 3-4. The Court ordered that, to the extent the deficiencies 17 identified could be cured, an amended complaint had to be filed by December 16, 2024. Jd. at 6. Court warned that failing to file an amended complaint “will result in the recommended 19 dismissal of this case.” /d. (emphasis in original). Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, 20 sought extension, or otherwise taken further action in this case. 21 Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that this case be DISMISSED without 22\Iprejudice. 23 Dated: December 18, 2024 Uf 4 4 — a 5 Nancy J. Koppe* United States Magistrate Judge 26 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation 7 The deadline for any party to object to this recommendation was January 1, 2025, and no 28 party filed anything or asked to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a

1}, magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” United States v. 2 Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 4] the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 10] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS 6], CASE. 2 g US Daidsiadge temitg)h Donwey 9 Dated: January 7, 2025

10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

El v. District Court Clark County, (D. Nev. 2025).

El v. District Court Clark County (El v. District Court Clark County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related