El Paso & Southwestern Co. v. United States

59 Ct. Cl. 93, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 622, 1924 WL 2340
United States Court of Claims·Decided January 7, 1924·No. No. 34481·Published

Opinion

[97] MEMORANDUM BX THE COURT

As to the portion of plaintiff’s claim stated in Finding VI, reference is made to Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. United States, 52 C. Cls. 468, and Oregon-Washington R. R. & Nav. Co. v. United States, 54 C. Cls. 131; 255 U. S. 339.

As to the remainder of the claim, reference is also made to Southern Pacific Co. v. United States, ante, p. 36, and Western Pacific R. R. Co. v. United States, ante, p. 67, both decided this day.

The form of the protest used in this case is not regarded as affecting the principle involved, which is discussed in detail in the cases referred to.

The petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

El Paso & Southwestern Co. v. United States, 59 Ct. Cl. 93, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 622, 1924 WL 2340 (cc 1924).

59 Ct. Cl. 93 (El Paso & Southwestern Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States
52 Ct. Cl. 468 (Court of Claims, 1917)