El Paso Natural Gas Company, a Corporation v. Frank S. Kelly, Jr., William H. McCartney and Robert L. Breedlove

321 F.2d 645
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedAugust 5, 1963
Docket7316_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 321 F.2d 645 (El Paso Natural Gas Company, a Corporation v. Frank S. Kelly, Jr., William H. McCartney and Robert L. Breedlove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
El Paso Natural Gas Company, a Corporation v. Frank S. Kelly, Jr., William H. McCartney and Robert L. Breedlove, 321 F.2d 645 (10th Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to an opinion and mandate of this Court on a former appeal. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Kelly, et al., 308 F.2d 820. It is contended that the judgment does not conform to the opinion and mandate.

“Upon remand from an appellate court with a specific mandate the trial court is limited to the imperative of the mandate and is without jurisdiction to vary or extend it.” Britton v. Dowell, Inc., 10 Cir., 243 F.2d 434. See also, Bastian v. Erickson, 10 Cir., 114 F.2d 338. In the former opinion we held that the plaintiffs had acquired 660 mineral acres on a weighted acreage basis which was alloted to them from three separate tracts in proportion to the ownership of their grantor in these tracts. To obtain this result a method of calculation was set forth. The judgment entered on the mandate is in accord with that method.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
321 F.2d 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/el-paso-natural-gas-company-a-corporation-v-frank-s-kelly-jr-william-ca10-1963.