El Papel LLC v. Inslee

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 EL PAPEL LLC, CASE NO. 2:20-cv-01323-RAJ-JRC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER EXPANDING 12 v. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 13 JAY INSLEE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter is before on its Order for Supplemental Briefing (Dkt. 127) and plaintiffs’ 17 motion for leave to add additional issues to that supplemental briefing. Dkt. 128. Defendant 18 Ferguson does not oppose the motion, and the City of Seattle defendants have “declined to take a 19 position at this time.” Dkt. 128, at 2. Generally, a request to expand page limitations does not 20 require a response, and the Court declines to await the City’s filing of a responsive brief before 21 ruling on the motion, which is noted for consideration on the same day that it was filed. LCR 22 7(f)(3). 23 24 1 The motion for leave to add additional issues to the supplemental briefing is granted. 2 Dkt. 128. In addition to the topics identified in the Court’s order for supplemental briefing, the 3 parties may address the relevance of Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, 141 S. Ct. 2063 (June 23, 4 2021) to plaintiffs’ Fifth Amendment takings claim. The supplemental briefing shall not exceed

5 twelve pages, per brief. 6 Dated this 23rd day of July, 2021. A 7 8 J. Richard Creatura Chief United States Magistrate Judge 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24