El-Mumit v. Fogg

Supreme Court of Louisiana

El-Mumit v. Fogg

505 So. 2d 733, 1987 La. LEXIS 11012

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 4, 1987

DocketNo. 87-KH-0925

StatusPublished

This text of 505 So. 2d 733 (El-Mumit v. Fogg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

El-Mumit v. Fogg, 505 So. 2d 733, 1987 La. LEXIS 11012 (La. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In re El-Mumit, Abdullah Hakim a/k/a; Sparks, Thomas Jr.; applying for mandamus, certiorari, supervisory, remedial; Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 48509.

Denied. On the showing made there does not appear to have been error in denial of relator’s motion for new trial without his having had an opportunity to subpoena and question his witnesses. Furthermore the method of hearing motions for a new trial is generally left to the discretion of the trial judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re El-Mumit, Abdullah Hakim a/k/a; Sparks, Thomas Jr.; applying for mandamus, certiorari, supervisory, remedial; Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 48509.

Denied. On the showing made there does not appear to have been error in denial of relator’s motion for new trial without his having had an opportunity to subpoena and question his witnesses. Furthermore the method of hearing motions for a new trial is generally left to the discretion of the trial judge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 So. 2d 733, 1987 La. LEXIS 11012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/el-mumit-v-fogg-la-1987.