El Charro TV Rental v. CIR

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in El Charro TV Rental v. CIR. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 F.3d 1145
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 26, 1996·No. 95-60301·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 95-60301 ________________________

EL CHARRO TV RENTAL, INC.; DIANA L. PETERS, Tax Matters Person, Petitioners-Appellants,

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the decision of the United States Tax Court (24840-91) ____________________________________________________

February 14, 1996 Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

El Charro appeals from the tax court’s decision holding that the rental units were not properly

depreciated under the income forecast method. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and

considered the arguments raised by the parties. Finding no error in the tax court’s ruling, we

AFFIRM for the reasons presented by the tax court in the opinion published at T.C. Memo. 1994-601

(U.S. Tax Ct. Dec. 7, 1994).

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

El Charro TV Rental v. CIR, (5th Cir. 1996).

El Charro TV Rental v. CIR (El Charro TV Rental v. CIR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.