El Chaar v. New York University

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 28, 2022·No. 1:22-cv-00856·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Bibs, □□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: nnn DATE FILED: 12/28/2022 DR. EDGARD EL CHAAR, Plaintiff, Civ. No.: 1:22-cv-00856 (AT) -against- STIPULATED NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF CONFIDENTIALITY DENTISTRY, AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant. nna ANNALISA TORRES, United States District Judge: WHEREAS all of the parties to this action (collectively, the “Parties,” and individually, a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of certain nonpublic and confidential material that will be exchanged pursuant to and during the course of discovery in this case; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that this Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords only extends to the limited information or items that are entitled, under the applicable legal principles, to confidential treatment; WHEREAS, discovery in this case may also require the disclosure of protected health information (“PHI”) that is regulated by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), the regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to enforce HIPAA, along with other federal regulations, including but not limited to 42 C.F.R. Part 2; WHEREAS, the Parties further acknowledge that this Protective Order does not create entitlement to file confidential information under seal; and WHEREAS, in light of these acknowledgements, and based on the representations of the Parties that discovery in this case will involve confidential documents or information the public disclosure of which will cause harm to the producing person and/or third party to whom a duty of confidentiality is owed, and to protect against injury caused by dissemination of confidential documents and information, this Court finds good cause for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Protective Order including without limitation the parties to this action, their representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual notice of this Protective Order shall adhere to the following terms: 1. This Order shall apply to all documents and things subject to discovery in this action produced either by a Party or a non-party in response to or in connection with any discovery conducted in this action, including without limitation, answers to interrogatories, documents and things produced (including documents and things produced for inspection), responses to written and electronic discovery requests, and answers to requests for admission, testimony adduced at depositions upon oral examination or upon written questions, as well as any and all copies, abstracts, digests, notes and summaries thereof (the “Discovery Material”) and shall continue to apply to them during the entire pretrial phase of this litigation, including discovery, dispositive motion practice, and pretrial motion practice. 2. Any person subject to this Protective Order who receives from any other person subject to this Protective Order any “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed pursuant to and in course of discovery in this action) that is designated as “Confidential” pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order (hereinafter “Confidential Discovery Material”) shall not disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder. 3. For the purposes of this Order, “Protected Health Information” or “PHI” shall have the definition given it in the HIPAA regulations which define PHI to include “individually identifiable health information,” which is, in turn, defined by the HIPAA regulations as information that “relates to the past, present, or future physical or mental health or condition of an individual; the provision of health care to an individual; or the past, present, or future payment for the provisions of health care to an individual; and that identifies the individual or with respect to which there is a reasonable basis to believe the information can be used to identify the individual.” 45 C.F.R. § 160.103. Individually identifiable health information includes patient names, addresses, and social security numbers; 4. With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the producing person or that person’s counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility; and (b) producing for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the confidential information redacted. This provision does not apply to documents that include PHI and Parties will abide by statutory requirements to ensure that unredacted Discovery Material that contains PHI are not produced. 5. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (each, “Producing Party”) may designate as CONFIDENTIAL only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of information deemed confidential, including but not limited to: (a) previously non-disclosed proprietary or confidential financial or business information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates); (b) previously non-disclosed proprietary or confidential material relating to ownership or control of any non-public company; (c) previously non-disclosed proprietary or confidential business plans or marketing plans; (d) any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual or Party or any other confidential information such as confidential family or health information; (e) confidential mental health and/or confidential medical information and PHI and/or individually identifiable health information, including but not limited to such information regarding the Plaintiff as defined by or subject to federal and/or state law or this Order; (f) non-public family, medical, mental health and/or employment records of non-parties; or (g) any other category of information this Court subsequently affords confidential status. 6. With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “CONFIDENTIAL” by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “CONFIDENTIAL” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility; and (b) producing for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the confidential information redacted. 7. A Producing Party or its counsel may, to the extent permitted by this Order or a Court Order, designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as CONFIDENTIAL Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for CONFIDENTIAL information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “CONFIDENTIAL Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

El Chaar v. New York University, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

El Chaar v. New York University (El Chaar v. New York University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)