El Bey v. Celebration Station

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 26, 2007
Docket06-2138
StatusUnpublished

This text of El Bey v. Celebration Station (El Bey v. Celebration Station) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
El Bey v. Celebration Station, (4th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2138

MOSAB HOIDINK EL BEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CELEBRATION STATION; WHITECO INDUSTRIAL INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

Officer T. R. STAMP,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:02-cv-00461)

Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 26, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mosab Hoidink El Bey, Appellant Pro Se. David Erik Albright, Travis Aaron Crump, SMITH & MOORE, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mosab Hoidink El Bey appealed the district court’s orders

granting summary judgment to Celebration Station and dismissing El

Bey’s civil action against defendant without prejudice for failure

to serve. El Bey’s complaint alleged violations of 42 U.S.C.

§§ 1983 and 1985 (2000) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 (2000). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See El Bey v. Celebration Station, No. 3:02-cv-00461

(W.D.N.C. Sept. 27 & 28, 2006). We deny El Bey’s motion for

misconduct proceedings against the district judge and Celebration

Station’s request for sanctions against El Bey. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1985
42 U.S.C. § 1985
§ 242
18 U.S.C. § 242

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
El Bey v. Celebration Station, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/el-bey-v-celebration-station-ca4-2007.