El-Amin v. Ohio State Penitentiary

2011 Ohio 5521
CourtOhio Court of Claims
DecidedJuly 19, 2011
Docket2011-03065-AD
StatusPublished

This text of 2011 Ohio 5521 (El-Amin v. Ohio State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
El-Amin v. Ohio State Penitentiary, 2011 Ohio 5521 (Ohio Super. Ct. 2011).

Opinion

[Cite as El-Amin v. Ohio State Penitentiary, 2011-Ohio-5521.]

Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

ODRAYE EL-AMIN (AKA JONES), Case No. 2011-03065-AD

Plaintiff,

v. Acting Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

OHIO STATE PENITENTIARY,

Defendant. MEMORANDUM DECISION

FINDINGS OF FACT

{¶ 1} On June 20, 2010, plaintiff, Odraye El-Amin (AKA Jones), an

inmate incarcerated at defendant’s Ohio State Penitentiary (OSP), was

transferred from OSP to an outside medical facility for treatment.

{¶ 2} Plaintiff asserts he was required to surrender his clothes and Nike

tennis shoes and to change into orange clothing and shoes for the transport.

Plaintiff alleges that his Nike shoes could not be located upon his return to OSP.

{¶ 3} Plaintiff claims he learned from others at OSP that his shoes were

thrown away. Plaintiff filed this complaint seeking to recover $64.48, for the

stated replacement cost of his missing shoes, and “a penalty” between an

additional $64.48 and $2400.00 for stress and anguish.1 The filing fee was paid.

{¶ 4} Plaintiff submitted with his complaint a “personal A/C Withdrawal

Check Out-Slip” which lists the purchase of “Misc. Nike” from Access Securepak

1 Initially, it should be noted that this court does not recognize entitlement to damages for mental distress and extraordinary damages for simple negligence involving property loss. Galloway v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (1979), 78-0731-AD; Berke v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Welfare (1976), 52 Ohio App. 2d 271, 6 O.O. 3d 280, 369 N.E. 2d 1056. Consequently, the court shall address plaintiff’s claim based on the standard measure of damages for property loss. for $64.48, on April 26, 2010.

{¶ 5} In the investigation report defendant admits liability for the loss of

the tennis shoes in the amount of $63.48 and specifically denies liability for any

mental anguish and stress. Defendant did not submit any documentation to

verify plaintiff paid only $63.48 for the shoes.

{¶ 6} Plaintiff filed a response insisting that he is entitled to all damages

claimed.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

{¶ 7} Negligence on the part of defendant has been shown in respect to

the issue of protecting plaintiff’s property after he was transferred. Billups v.

Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (2001), 2000-10634-AD, jud.

{¶ 8} As trier of fact, this court has the power to award reasonable

damages based on evidence presented. Sims v. Southern Ohio Correctional

Facility (1988), 61 Ohio Misc. 2d 239, 577 N.E. 2d 160.

{¶ 9} Damage assessment is a matter within the function of the trier of

fact. Litchfield v. Morris (1985), 25 Ohio App. 3d 42, 25 OBR 115, 495 N.E. 2d

462. Reasonable certainty as to the amount of damages is required, which is

that degree of certainty of which the nature of the case admits. Bemmes v. Pub.

Emp. Retirement Sys. Of Ohio (1995), 102 Ohio App. 3d 782, 658 N.E. 2d 31.

{¶ 10} Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of $64.48, plus the

$25.00 filing fee, which may be reimbursed as compensable damages pursuant

to the holding in Bailey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

(1990), 62 Ohio Misc. 2d 19, 587 N.E. 2d 990. Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

Defendant.

ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION

Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons

set forth in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is

rendered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $89.48, which includes the filing fee.

Court costs are assessed against defendant.

DANIEL R. BORCHERT Acting Clerk

Entry cc:

Odraye El-Amin (aka Jones), #358-112 Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel 878 Coitsville-Hubbard Road Department of Rehabilitation Youngstown, Ohio 44505 and Correction 770 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43222 6/8 Filed 7/19/11 Sent to S.C. reporter 10/27/11

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bemmes v. Public Employees Retirement System
658 N.E.2d 31 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)
Berke v. Ohio Dept. of Public Welfare
369 N.E.2d 1056 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1976)
Litchfield v. Morris
495 N.E.2d 462 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 Ohio 5521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/el-amin-v-ohio-state-penitentiary-ohioctcl-2011.