Ekstrand & Tholand, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Ekstrand & Tholand, Inc. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 263

United States Customs Court·Decided October 6, 1955·No. No. 59327; protest 251415-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When the case was called for trial, the collector’s letter of transmittal was received in evidence, wherein he states that the merchandise would now be properly classified at 22)4 percent under the provision in paragraph 360, as modified, supra, for drawing instruments. Government counsel conceded that the classification should have been as contended by the plaintiff. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When the case was called for trial, the collector’s letter of transmittal was received in evidence, wherein he states that the merchandise would now be properly classified at 22)4 percent under the provision in paragraph 360, as modified, supra, for drawing instruments. Government counsel conceded that the classification should have been as contended by the plaintiff. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Ekstrand & Tholand, Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 263 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

35 Cust. Ct. 263 (Ekstrand & Tholand, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.