Ekstrand & Tholand, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Ekstrand & Tholand, Inc. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 263

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 6, 1955

DocketNo. 59327; protest 251415-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 263 (Ekstrand & Tholand, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ekstrand & Tholand, Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 263 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When the case was called for trial, the collector’s letter of transmittal was received in evidence, wherein he states that the merchandise would now be properly classified at 22)4 percent under the provision in paragraph 360, as modified, supra, for drawing instruments. Government counsel conceded that the classification should have been as contended by the plaintiff. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When the case was called for trial, the collector’s letter of transmittal was received in evidence, wherein he states that the merchandise would now be properly classified at 22)4 percent under the provision in paragraph 360, as modified, supra, for drawing instruments. Government counsel conceded that the classification should have been as contended by the plaintiff. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Cust. Ct. 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ekstrand-tholand-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1955.