Ekstam v. Ekstam
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1043
CHARLES L. EKSTAM, FUEL PREPORATOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., and EKSTAM WORLDWIDE, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
C. BRAD EKSTAM, DIESEL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC., and C. BRAD EKSTAM (doing business as Diesel Performance Products Co.),
Defendants-Appellees.
Michael J. Thomas, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C., of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Kara R. Yancey.
James J. Kernell, Erickson, Kernell, Derusseau & Kleypas, LLC, of Overland Park, Kansas, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Lara L. McInerney and Michael Yakimo, Jr.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Magistrate Judge Audrey G. Fleissig NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1043
CHARLES L. EKSTAM, FUEL PREPORATOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., and EKSTAM WORLDWIDE, INC.,
C. BRAD EKSTAM, DIESEL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC., and C. BRAD EKSTAM (doing business as Diesel Performance Products Co.),
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
in CASE NO(S). 4:04-CV-00187
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and LINN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED July 14, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ekstam v. Ekstam (Ekstam v. Ekstam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.