Ekokotu v. Bundy American Corp

Fourth Circuit

Ekokotu v. Bundy American Corp

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 5, 2004

Docket03-2234

StatusUnpublished

This text of Ekokotu v. Bundy American Corp (Ekokotu v. Bundy American Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ekokotu v. Bundy American Corp, (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2234

SUNNY O. EKOKOTU,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BUNDY AMERICAN CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 1258-AMD)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: March 5, 2004

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sunny O. Ekokotu, Appellant Pro Se. Maurice Michael LaPlaca, Jr., Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Sunny O. Ekokotu appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to vacate the arbitrator’s award. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ekokotu v.

Bundy American Corp., No. CA-03-1258-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 22, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI