Eke v. Bank of America

Fourth Circuit

Eke v. Bank of America

407 F. App'x 634

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2010·No. No. 10-2036·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Emeka Eke appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Bank of America, NA and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Eke v. Bank of America, NA, 3:09-cv-00488-RLW, 2010 WL 3122806 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Emeka Eke appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Bank of America, NA and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Eke v. Bank of America, NA, 3:09-cv-00488-RLW, 2010 WL 3122806 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Eke v. Bank of America, 407 F. App'x 634 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

407 F. App'x 634 (Eke v. Bank of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.