Eke v. Bank of America
This text of 407 F. App'x 634 (Eke v. Bank of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Emeka Eke appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Bank of America, NA and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Eke v. Bank of America, NA, 3:09-cv-00488-RLW, 2010 WL 3122806 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 F. App'x 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eke-v-bank-of-america-ca4-2010.