Ekbatani v. Rockefeller Center Properties

30 A.D.3d 347, 816 N.Y.S.2d 909
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 29, 2006·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered on or about April 4, 2005, which granted the motion on behalf of defendant Rockefeller Center Ice Skating Rink to dismiss the complaint and denied plaintiffs cross motion to extend the time for service, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to serve defendants within the required 120-day period (CPLR 306-b). In view of such lack of diligence and the long delay in notifying' defendants of this action, an extension of time to serve was unwarranted, and dismissal was appropriate (Slate v Schiavone Constr. Co., 4 NY3d 816 [2005]; Yardeni v Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hosp., 9 AD3d 296 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 704 [2005]). Concur—Buckley, RJ., Sullivan, Williams, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ekbatani v. Rockefeller Center Properties, 30 A.D.3d 347, 816 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

30 A.D.3d 347 (Ekbatani v. Rockefeller Center Properties) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chen v. New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens
2021 NY Slip Op 06944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Posada v. Pelaez
37 A.D.3d 168 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)