Ekahtor v. Ashcroft
This text of 116 F. App'x 478 (Ekahtor v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We conclude that the BIA’s interpretation of 8 C.F.R. § 1245(a) is reasonable and thus worthy of deference. See Hamdan v. INS, 98 F.3d 183, 185 (5th Cir.1996). We therefore deny review of the BIA’s order of removal.
Review is DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
116 F. App'x 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ekahtor-v-ashcroft-ca5-2004.