E.J.R. v. State
This text of 722 So. 2d 970 (E.J.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
E.J.R., who was placed on community control, argues that his disposition order should be corrected to reflect that the maximum term of community control that can be imposed on him is one year, which is the maximum term an adult could serve for the same offense, or the date of his nineteenth birthday, whichever occurs first. The only argument raised by the state is that the issue is not preserved, but we concluded in T.G. v. State, 717 So.2d 128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) that in juvenile cases, the failure to preserve does not bar appellate review. We therefore re[971]*971mand for amendment of the disposition order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
722 So. 2d 970, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 67, 1999 WL 2691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ejr-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.