Ejede v. Holder

471 F. App'x 129
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 10, 2012·No. No. 11-1959·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Noella Mbolle Ejede Ejede, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her applications for relief from removal and remanding the record to the Immigration Judge to pro[130]*130vide all advisals required by the grant of voluntary departure to Ejede, and for entry of a new decision. While we have jurisdiction over the Board’s order, we dismiss the petition for review without prejudice for prudential reasons. See Qingyun Li v. Holder, 666 F.3d 147 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ejede v. Holder, 471 F. App'x 129 (4th Cir. 2012).

471 F. App'x 129 (Ejede v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Qingyun Li v. Eric Holder, Jr.
666 F.3d 147 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)