E.J. Brooks Company v. Cambridge Security Seals
This text of E.J. Brooks Company v. Cambridge Security Seals (E.J. Brooks Company v. Cambridge Security Seals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 109 E.J. Brooks Company, &c., Appellant-Respondent, v. Cambridge Security Seals, Respondent-Appellant.
Daniel B. Goldman, for appellant-respondent. Howard W. Schub, for respondent-appellant.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Certification of questions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.27 of this Court's Rules of Practice, accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judge Feinman took no part.
Decided June 27, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
E.J. Brooks Company v. Cambridge Security Seals, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ej-brooks-company-v-cambridge-security-seals-ny-2017.