Eissler v. Allied Waterproofing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Eissler v. Allied Waterproofing Co.

393 S.W.3d 620, 2013 WL 978719, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 309

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 12, 2013·No. No. ED 98753·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Scott T. Eissler, appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the order of the Appeals Tribunal dismissing his appeal from the deputy’s determination. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the order of Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Scott T. Eissler, appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the order of the Appeals Tribunal dismissing his appeal from the deputy’s determination. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the order of Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Eissler v. Allied Waterproofing Co., 393 S.W.3d 620, 2013 WL 978719, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 309 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

393 S.W.3d 620 (Eissler v. Allied Waterproofing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.