Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Eiss v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Eiss v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

247 A.D.2d 913, 668 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1258
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 4, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D.2d 913 (Eiss v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eiss v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 247 A.D.2d 913, 668 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on [914]*914the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: In this personal injury action, Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff Peter Eiss to demonstrate on videotape the manner in which he was using a jointer-planer at the time he was injured (see, Dale v Emerson Elec. Co., 219 AD2d 815). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Burns, J. — Discovery.)

Present— Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Memorandum: In

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dale v. Emerson Electric Co.
219 A.D.2d 815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D.2d 913, 668 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eiss-v-sears-roebuck-co-nyappdiv-1998.