Eisman v. Eisman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eisman v. Eisman

244 A.D. 821

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Order dismissing the amended complaint for insufficiency pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Price v. Price, 75 N. Y. 244; Cooper v. Cooper, 147 Mass. 370; 17 N. E. 892; Payne’s Appeal from Comrs., 65 Conn. 397; 32 A. 948; contra, Higgins v. Breen, 9 Mo. 497.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dismissing the amended complaint for insufficiency pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Price v. Price, 75 N. Y. 244; Cooper v. Cooper, 147 Mass. 370; 17 N. E. 892; Payne’s Appeal from Comrs., 65 Conn. 397; 32 A. 948; contra, Higgins v. Breen, 9 Mo. 497.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Eisman v. Eisman, 244 A.D. 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

244 A.D. 821 (Eisman v. Eisman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related