Eisman v. Eisman
This text of 244 A.D. 821 (Eisman v. Eisman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dismissing the amended complaint for insufficiency pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Price v. Price, 75 N. Y. 244; Cooper v. Cooper, 147 Mass. 370; 17 N. E. 892; Payne’s Appeal from Comrs., 65 Conn. 397; 32 A. 948; contra, Higgins v. Breen, 9 Mo. 497.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eisman-v-eisman-nyappdiv-1935.