Eisman v. Eisman

244 A.D. 821

This text of 244 A.D. 821 (Eisman v. Eisman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eisman v. Eisman, 244 A.D. 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Order dismissing the amended complaint for insufficiency pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Price v. Price, 75 N. Y. 244; Cooper v. Cooper, 147 Mass. 370; 17 N. E. 892; Payne’s Appeal from Comrs., 65 Conn. 397; 32 A. 948; contra, Higgins v. Breen, 9 Mo. 497.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Price v. . Price
75 N.Y. 244 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)
Cooper v. Cooper
17 N.E. 892 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Payne's Appeal from the Doings of Commissioners
32 A. 948 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1895)
Higgins v. Breen
9 Mo. 493 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1845)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D. 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eisman-v-eisman-nyappdiv-1935.