Eisinger v. Gill

D.C. Circuit

Eisinger v. Gill

47 App. D.C. 315, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2411

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 4, 1918

DocketNos. 3056 and 3057

StatusPublished

This text of 47 App. D.C. 315 (Eisinger v. Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eisinger v. Gill, 47 App. D.C. 315, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2411 (D.C. Cir. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Eobb

delivered the opinion of the Court:

By stipulation of counsel, these eases were to abide by the decision in No. 3055, ante, 312. It follows, therefore, that the judgments in these cases will be affirmed, with costs.

Affirmed.

[316]*316Mr. Justice Sikdonp, of the Supreme Court of tlie District of Columbia, sat with the Court in the hearing and determination of this appeal, in the place of Mr. Justice Van Orsdel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Eobb

delivered the opinion of the Court:

By stipulation of counsel, these eases were to abide by the decision in No. 3055, ante, 312. It follows, therefore, that the judgments in these cases will be affirmed, with costs.

Affirmed.

[316]*316Mr. Justice Sikdonp, of the Supreme Court of tlie District of Columbia, sat with the Court in the hearing and determination of this appeal, in the place of Mr. Justice Van Orsdel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 App. D.C. 315, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eisinger-v-gill-cadc-1918.