Eisiminger v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.

Third Circuit

Eisiminger v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.

945 F.2d 394, 1991 WL 194716

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedSeptember 24, 1991

Docket90-3490

StatusPublished

This text of 945 F.2d 394 (Eisiminger v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eisiminger v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co., 945 F.2d 394, 1991 WL 194716 (3d Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

945 F.2d 394

Eisiminger (Ralph T., Loretta A.)
v.
Consol- Pennsylvania Coal Company, Rhein Braun U.S.,
Monongahela Railway Company, Reese (William), Boggs (David),
Pollock (Ewing), Pollock, Pollock and Thomas, The Upshur
Agency, Inc., Consolidated Coal Company, Consol-Land
Development Company, Rheinische Braunkohlenwerke,
Verkaufsgesellschaft (Maria Therese)

NO. 90-3490

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

SEP 24, 1991

Appeal From: W.D.Pa.,

Smith, J.,

740 F.Supp. 1126

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI