Eisenmeyer v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eisenmeyer v. Hults

18 A.D.2d 1067, 239 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3878

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 23, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1067 (Eisenmeyer v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eisenmeyer v. Hults, 18 A.D.2d 1067, 239 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, dated March 1, 1962, removing petitioner as a Principal Motor Vehicle License Examiner, annulled, on the law, only to the extent of dismissing charge 3, and is otherwise confirmed, without costs to either party. Charge 3 alleged that petitioner solicited and received money to influence the results of departmental hearings. The Commissioner sustained the charge, but no evidence is found to support it. There is substantial evidence supporting the other equally serious charges sustained. Despite petitioner’s contentions, he was accorded fair treatment and extended adjournments, the latter more than sufficient to offset whatever difficulties were created by the necessarily general proof. Concur — Breitei, J. P., Rabin, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, dated March 1, 1962, removing petitioner as a Principal Motor Vehicle License Examiner, annulled, on the law, only to the extent of dismissing charge 3, and is otherwise confirmed, without costs to either party. Charge 3 alleged that petitioner solicited and received money to influence the results of departmental hearings. The Commissioner sustained the charge, but no evidence is found to support it. There is substantial evidence supporting the other equally serious charges sustained. Despite petitioner’s contentions, he was accorded fair treatment and extended adjournments, the latter more than sufficient to offset whatever difficulties were created by the necessarily general proof. Concur — Breitei, J. P., Rabin, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1067, 239 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eisenmeyer-v-hults-nyappdiv-1963.