Eisenlord v. . Dillenback

New York Court of Appeals

Eisenlord v. . Dillenback

79 N.Y. 617, 1879 N.Y. LEXIS 1027

New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 1879·Published

Opinion

Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur, except Church, Ch. J., audRAPALLO J., dissenting, being for reversal on the ground that the indorse *618 ment of past due paper creates an absolute liability ; but it is conceded that The current of authorities is to the effect that in such a case a demand within a reasonable time is necessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur, except Church, Ch. J., audRAPALLO J., dissenting, being for reversal on the ground that the indorse *618 ment of past due paper creates an absolute liability ; but it is conceded that The current of authorities is to the effect that in such a case a demand within a reasonable time is necessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Eisenlord v. . Dillenback, 79 N.Y. 617, 1879 N.Y. LEXIS 1027 (N.Y. 1879).

Pincite

79 N.Y. 617 (Eisenlord v. . Dillenback) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.