Eisenhauer v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Eisenhauer v. Williams

537 S.W.2d 336, 1976 Tex. App. LEXIS 2769

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 12, 1976

Docket15522

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 537 S.W.2d 336 (Eisenhauer v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eisenhauer v. Williams, 537 S.W.2d 336, 1976 Tex. App. LEXIS 2769 (Tex. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

BARROW, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Roland A. Eisenhauer, Executor of the Estate-of Julia H. Taylor, Deceased, has perfected his appeal from an order sustaining appellee’s plea in abatement and dismissing appellant’s suit for construction of a will.

The holographic will of Julia H. Taylor was admitted to probate in the County Court of Bexar County on January 2, 1975, and Letters Testamentary were granted to appellant. On July 25, 1975, while the probate proceedings were still pending in the County Court, appellant filed this action in the 150th Judicial District Court of Bexar County under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act seeking a construction and interpretation of said will. Appellee, Edward A. Williams, Jr., filed his plea in abatement wherein it was asserted that the will had been originally filed for probate in the County Court of Bexar County and that this estate was still pending in that Court.

Appellant urges by his sole point of error that the District Court erred in concluding that it did not have jurisdiction to construe a will. Such point is based on a *337 faulty premise in that the District Court did not so conclude. Rather, the Court found that “by virtue of the Probate Court of Bexar County having already heretofore acquired jurisdiction of this matter” the plea in abatement should be sustained.

Bexar County has a statutory county court exercising the jurisdiction of a probate court; therefore, such court has original probate jurisdiction with the power to hear all matters incident to an estate including an action to construe the will. Sec. 5, Texas Probate Code, Tex.Rev.Civ. Stat.Ann.

A suit for declaratory judgment will not be entertained if there is pending, at the time it is filed, another action or proceeding between the same parties and in which may be adjudicated the issues involved in the declaratory action. Texas Liquor Control Board v. Canyon Creek Land Corporation, 456 S.W.2d 891 (Tex.1970).

Here the Probate Court acquired jurisdiction of the estate with power to construe the will prior to the suit being filed in the District Court. The District Court did not err in sustaining the plea in abatement.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARROW, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Roland A. Eisenhauer, Executor of the Estate-of Julia H. Taylor, Deceased, has perfected his appeal from an order sustaining appellee’s plea in abatement and dismissing appellant’s suit for construction of a will.

The holographic will of Julia H. Taylor was admitted to probate in the County Court of Bexar County on January 2, 1975, and Letters Testamentary were granted to appellant. On July 25, 1975, while the probate proceedings were still pending in the County Court, appellant filed this action in the 150th Judicial District Court of Bexar County under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act seeking a construction and interpretation of said will. Appellee, Edward A. Williams, Jr., filed his plea in abatement wherein it was asserted that the will had been originally filed for probate in the County Court of Bexar County and that this estate was still pending in that Court.

Appellant urges by his sole point of error that the District Court erred in concluding that it did not have jurisdiction to construe a will. Such point is based on a *337 faulty premise in that the District Court did not so conclude. Rather, the Court found that “by virtue of the Probate Court of Bexar County having already heretofore acquired jurisdiction of this matter” the plea in abatement should be sustained.

Bexar County has a statutory county court exercising the jurisdiction of a probate court; therefore, such court has original probate jurisdiction with the power to hear all matters incident to an estate including an action to construe the will. Sec. 5, Texas Probate Code, Tex.Rev.Civ. Stat.Ann.

A suit for declaratory judgment will not be entertained if there is pending, at the time it is filed, another action or proceeding between the same parties and in which may be adjudicated the issues involved in the declaratory action. Texas Liquor Control Board v. Canyon Creek Land Corporation, 456 S.W.2d 891 (Tex.1970).

Here the Probate Court acquired jurisdiction of the estate with power to construe the will prior to the suit being filed in the District Court. The District Court did not err in sustaining the plea in abatement.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 S.W.2d 336, 1976 Tex. App. LEXIS 2769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eisenhauer-v-williams-texapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack