Eisenberg v. Tuchman

899 A.2d 36, 278 Conn. 909
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 4, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 899 A.2d 36 (Eisenberg v. Tuchman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eisenberg v. Tuchman, 899 A.2d 36, 278 Conn. 909 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

899 A.2d 36 (2006)
278 Conn. 909

David S. EISENBERG, Trustee, et al.
v.
Alma TUCHMAN.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 4, 2006.

Charles A. DeLuca and Sarah F. DePanfilis, Stamford, in support of the petition.

Miles F. McDonald, Joyce H. Young, Greenwich, Haden P. Gerrish and Fernando F. deArango, assistant town attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn.App. 364, 892 A.2d 1016 (2006), is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eisenberg v. Tuchman
892 A.2d 1016 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
899 A.2d 36, 278 Conn. 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eisenberg-v-tuchman-conn-2006.