Eisenberg v. Rockland County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eisenberg v. Rockland County

19 A.D.3d 536, 796 N.Y.S.2d 532

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 A.D.3d 536 (Eisenberg v. Rockland County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eisenberg v. Rockland County, 19 A.D.3d 536, 796 N.Y.S.2d 532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Meir Orenstein appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated August 23, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion, in effect, for prejudgment interest from the date that the plaintiffs were granted summary judgment on the issue of liability against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ motion, in effect, for pre-judgment interest pursuant to CPLR 5002 from the date of the order granting them summary judgment on the issue of liability against the appellant (see Love v State of New York, 78 NY2d 540 [1991]). Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Meir Orenstein appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated August 23, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion, in effect, for prejudgment interest from the date that the plaintiffs were granted summary judgment on the issue of liability against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ motion, in effect, for pre-judgment interest pursuant to CPLR 5002 from the date of the order granting them summary judgment on the issue of liability against the appellant (see Love v State of New York, 78 NY2d 540 [1991]). Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 536, 796 N.Y.S.2d 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eisenberg-v-rockland-county-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack