Eisenberg v. Reasenberg

169 N.E. 656, 252 N.Y. 490, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 650
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 7, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon this record the jury could properly find that the defendant had no information and no belief that the plaintiff had been guilty of any wrong. The privilege of transmitting information of an alleged crime to the appropriate public officers cannot apply to a communication sent under such circumstances.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eisenberg v. Reasenberg, 169 N.E. 656, 252 N.Y. 490, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 650 (N.Y. 1930).

169 N.E. 656 (Eisenberg v. Reasenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. Pratt
174 Misc. 585 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)