Eisenberg v. Reasenberg

New York Court of Appeals

Eisenberg v. Reasenberg

169 N.E. 656, 252 N.Y. 490, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 650

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 7, 1930

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 N.E. 656 (Eisenberg v. Reasenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eisenberg v. Reasenberg, 169 N.E. 656, 252 N.Y. 490, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 650 (N.Y. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon this record the jury could properly find that the defendant had no information and no belief that the plaintiff had been guilty of any wrong. The privilege of transmitting information of an alleged crime to the appropriate public officers cannot apply to a communication sent under such circumstances.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI